Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 261 - 280
of 890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2018, 11:21 am
Atkins and Scott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
To determine strength, courts place the mark on the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness most prominently discussed in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 10:43 am
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
All of this week’s new relists involve the Supreme Court’s 2002 opinion in Atkins v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:13 pm
UPDATE: Michael Atkins is on the case too. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:14 pm
Simmons and Atkins v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Tax lawyer Tripp Atkins is currently analyzing the 20-factor IRS test for determining an employee or independent contractor on his blog.The safest course is to treat workers as employees if the workers' status as an independent contractor could reasonably be questioned. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm
It rejected other non-scientific factors often employed to deny claims of intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:21 am
Specifically, the court concluded that the Ohio court's application of Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:47 pm
Six years later, of course, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:41 pm
(See Coker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:13 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
The new death penalty case from Florida raised this issue: “Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
Atkins [Atkins v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:01 pm
Allen v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
Supreme Court scrutinizing lawyers," written by Kimberly Atkins. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:17 am
Number 4 is the Seventh Circuit's decision in AutoZone v. [read post]
