Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 281 - 300
of 891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The Court heard nine cases during the March session when Michigan v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Texas 14-989 Issue: (1) Whether a capital defendant’s intellectual function should be assessed at the time of the crime and trial, as Atkins v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:04 am
James Heath of Atkins Thomson is Lead Solicitor for the Claimants in this case. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:04 am
Atkins, 2015 NCBC 44. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:49 pm
And they're up to 4 law clerks/staff attorneys each.From the oral argument before the court Monday morning in Brumfield v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
Lynaugh that intellectual disability in that range should be considered as a mitigating factor to be weighed in the balance, not a trump card.Even so, in Atkins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday over how to apply the court's 2002 decision Atkins v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
But if the Court is to decide the case it heard on Monday, Brumfield v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:22 pm
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The basis for each of these prohibitions is the 8th Amendment's ban of cruel and unusual punishment.Mental disability made the list via the 2002 decision in Atkins v Virginia. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In its decision in 2002 in Atkins v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
<> Case Update: Michigan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:04 am
Ellis (University of New Mexico - School of Law) has posted Hall v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am
Atkins [Atkins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:24 pm
“Same as healthcare,” noted former Commissioners Atkins, apparently referring to the Court's decision is National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:50 am
And today at "Daily Kos," Dante Atkins has a post titled "Do the King v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm
It is also worth recalling the words of Lord Atkin in Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 at 386: It is precisely because the real damage cannot be ascertained and established that the damages are at large. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
