Search for: "Atkins v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Sims 12-1217Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:42 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm
Commonwealth tackles the intersection of Atkins and competency. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm
She begins with an historical defense: From the birth of the United States as a nation, foreign and international law influenced legal reasoning and judicial decisionmaking. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
United States on materiality of misrepresentations made while buying a gun, particularly being a "straw purchaser. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
§ 3596(c) and Atkins v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
" Keyes concluded that Clark should be excluded from execution under both the Texas Mentally Retarded Persons Act and the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
Rev. 1687), A Tale of Two Nations: Implementation of the Death Penalty in "Executing" Versus "Symbolic" States in the United States, by Carol S. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:19 pm
Atkins et al., No. 2020-0183-MTZ opinion issued (Del. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
In Georgia, a defendant invoking Atkins v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am
United States, 559 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1977); Atkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
Nothing in her remarks evidenced any sympathy with shareholders and their substantive rights under state law.The irony in the positions taken by Casey and Atkins is that the access proposal in fact permits private ordering and respects state law. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Korematsu v. the United States : World War II Japanese-American internment camps. [read post]
