Search for: "Atkins v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Texas 15-65Issue: Whether Texas’s standard for determining if a capital defendant meets the second prong of the definition of intellectual disability (“deficits in adaptive functioning”) violates the Eighth Amendment in light of Atkins v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about the evidentiary requirements of the federal Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986, a measure designed to treat analogue substances designed for human consumption the same as controlled substances. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 2 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 2009), mandating a cut-off IQ score of 70 or below to meet the first prong of the test for mental retardation in capital sentencing, is contrary to Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
United States Former President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay writer, E Jean Carroll, $83.3 million in her defamation claim against him. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:00 pm
Implications of the Growth of Hedge Funds, Staff Report the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (September 2003). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]