Search for: "Atkinson v. Taylor"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 8:39 am
”)AC30464 - Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 531-32, 82 S. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 531-32, 82 S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:42 pm
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 537-538 (U.S. 1962) (Stewart, J., dissenting); see also Crooks v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia The decision in the defamation case brought by former political staffer, Bruce Lehrmann, against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson was due to be handed down this week, however the ruling has been delayed due to fresh evidence being given by former Channel Seven producer Taylor Auerbach. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:49 pm
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 532, 82 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Between 26 to 28 February 2024, there was a trial in the case of Parsons v Atkinson QB-2021-004305 before Farbey J in Manchester. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
Taylor, J.A. for the Court quoted the well-known statement of principle of Lord Atkinson in Toronto Ry. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On Thursday 14 March 2024 there was a contempt application in the case of Taylor v Chief Constable of Kent, QB-2022-000310. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Cheryl Taylor Page and Bill Piatt, Human Trafficking (2023). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:31 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
