Search for: "Atkinson v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 1:43 pm
On Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed the question of whether the 1962 U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Google Facebook Isn’t a Constructive Public Trust–Cameron Atkinson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm
ShareOn Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
Selected Related Posts About State Action Claims Facebook Isn’t a Constructive Public Trust–Cameron Atkinson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
However, the court says: Atkinson pleads no specific facts about which members of the United States government pressured Facebook, how they did so, or any causal connection between the alleged pressure and Facebook’s actions. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
Stephen ReillyAndrew JonesData breach class action lawsuits are already well-established in the United States, but are only developing elsewhere. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit noted in Atkinson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Panopticon Blog had a piece about the representative action in the case of Atkinson v Equifax, which has now been withdrawn. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Tong v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 6:47 pm
This had been confirmed, inter alia, in another case involving financial IO Atkinson v Inter-American Development Bank. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
