Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Bruen (597 U.S. 1) is going to be kicking around for the next few years for reasons that become apparent from the Superior Court’s precedential ruling in Com. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Plus there are dozens of district attorneys (plus the California Attorney General) aware of the problem and with access to the sympathetic ear of state legislators.Given this fact, I decided that it's probably best to simply let this one sit. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:19 pm
Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
June 6, 2022)Delaware courts generally do not permit the redaction of non-responsive material that is otherwise not privileged. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Four further senior Judges sit on the Committee while the Attorney General and Law Society each get to appoint a further 4 members[28]. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Feb. 8, 2018). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Feb. 8, 2018). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
The 2nd District Court of Appeal recently affirmed a ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Jane Johnson in Perez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:55 am
In 2017, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision, Merrifield v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Mayhew of Stanislaw Superior Court issued his Notice of Hearing on Issues Re Remand (pdf)in the case of Debra Coito v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:48 pm
However, a recent unpublished opinion from the Superior Court, Scungio Borst & Assoc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:18 am
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Daniel J. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:07 am
Office of the Attorney Gen. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:24 am
The Superior Court in Barrick also found that the communications from the attorney to the expert were generally protected under the attorney work product doctrine as those communications contained mental impressions, conclusions, legal analysis etc. of the attorney which were all protected from disclosure under Pa.R.C.P. 4003.3. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:57 am
The second noteworthy holding in Arias is the court's conclusion that the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") (Lab. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:08 pm
In another recent venue decision out of the Superior Court in the case of Wimble v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:58 am
Then again, the Superior Court is an intermediate appellate court. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 1:39 pm
Superior Court of San Diego County (Lawson),1 the California Supreme Court held that unpaid wages are not civil penalties under California Labor Code section 558 and are therefore outside the reach of California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 12:00 am
In the case of Holland v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:25 pm
Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws. [read post]
