Search for: "Attorney Grievance v. Goldstein"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 2:48 am
On or about February 2, 2005, the respondent commenced another action entitled Goldstein v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
Katyal quickly pointed out that Goldstein had used a line from Nevada v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Stephens 13-1406Issue: Whether attorney abandonment, which Maples v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Disclosure: If you’ve gone to the trouble of copying and pasting this, you now know that Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The CaseCalifornia’s Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) allows an employee “aggrieved” by a violation of state’s wage, hour, and wage payment law to obtain civil penalties “on behalf of himself and other current or former employees. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this casezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.] [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm
(Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell filed an amicus brief in this case in support of respondent Cheryl Perich. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:53 am
The Supreme Court will resolve that question in Heffernan v. [read post]
