Search for: "Atwater v. Lago Vista"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 1:29 pm
Lago Vista Decided Correctly? [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
City of Lago Vista (with notes on Moore) on what crimes can lead to arrest. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 10:20 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 20 years ago in Atwater v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In 2001, the US Supreme Court handed down Atwater v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 11:10 am
Lago Vista, which was decided in 2001. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
City of Lago Vista. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 8:46 am
First, after the US Supreme Court okayed the practice in Atwater v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:40 pm
City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 354 (2001). [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 5:03 am
See Atwater v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 6:43 pm
Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
Lago Vista, 532 U. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
Lago Vista, 532 U. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
In Atwater v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am
Lago Vista, 532 U. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318, 121 S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
City of Lago Vista, in which the Court held that a full-blown custodial arrest may be made if the police have probable cause to suspect that even a low-level traffic violation has occurred. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
”) Atwater v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
First, as explained at length in Part III of Atwater v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:46 am
City of Lago Vista that police can make arrests for fine only offenses, so the new statute won't prevent people for going to jail over library fines. [read post]
