Search for: "Austin v. Georgia" Results 81 - 100 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
Posted by Omesh Kini, Georgia State University, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Agency costs, Agency model, Behavioral finance, Compensation consultants, Conflicts of interest, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Market efficiency Corporate Litigation and Non-Reliance Provisions Posted by Joseph M. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Clayton County, Georgia, 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Jarvis, Univ of Texas, Austin; Clariza Ruiz De Castilla, Univ of Texas, Austin: Are Latinos Citizens? [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:48 am
The editorial board implicitly refers to Coker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:25 pm
- Georgia attorney Ken Shigley of Shigley Law Firm in his Atlanta Injury Law & Civil Litigation Blog Trademark licenses in bankruptcy: new developments in the N.C.P. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:35 pm by Steve Graham
In Washington State, the case that approves of blood tests by force was Seattle v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:45 am by Silver Law Group
Lucie, Ormand Beach, Stuart, Lake Worth, Palm Bay, Daytona Beach, as well as Columbia, Maryland; Daphne, Alabama; Savannah, Georgia; and Austin, Houston, and Sugarland, Texas. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Andis Kaulins
Georgia Bulldogs by 37.5 Georgia 35-0 Georgia 45-0 Elon v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
July 28, 2015) — A unanimous DC Circuit granted several challenges, invalidating the 2014 SO2 emissions budgets imposed on Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and Texas, and the 2014 ozone-season NOx budgets for Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm by Mark Walsh
There are two other Ohio plaintiffs here, Georgia Nicole and Pamela Yorksmith. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am by Lyle Denniston
  (That might be called the “Ashcroft change”because Congress in 2006 was reacting to a 2003 Supreme Court decision, Georgia v. [read post]