Search for: "B & C ENTERPRISES v. Utter"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 6:39 am
See Huckins v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 8:53 am
See Barrows v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
United States present the question of how that provision should be read: whether a defendant is ineligible for relief from the mandatory minimum if her criminal history runs afoul of any one of the disqualifying criteria in subsections (A), (B), or (C), or is ineligible only if her criminal history runs afoul of all three disqualifying criteria, subsections (A), (B), and (C). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Some more from Justice Brennan in Garrison v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm
For instance, in an Ericsson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
And here is our reply to that: B. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:29 pm
Hr’g Tr., Sunlust Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mabry, No. 06-2324, 06-2322 Defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, are affirmed over claims that: 1) the informal resolution of a payment dispute qualified as a "settlement" under 29 U.S.C. section 186(c)(2); 2) insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding that the exception to liability under… [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
(for now) – District Court C D California judgement in Carter Bryant v Mattel (Property, intangible) (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golden – Plaintiff need not attach copyright registration to complaint: Golden v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Co., No. 19 C 3083, 2023 WL 4297654, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
Clinton, then, was announcing what might have been considered Option C — a massive lawsuit, perhaps the biggest civil case the federal government had ever filed, in any court. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
C. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
Eventually, in Stone v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
E.g., SEC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Dial, No. 07-30696 Sentence for mail fraud and uttering false securities is affirmed where: 1) the standard of review for the imposition of an enhancement for abuse of a position of trust was clear error, not de novo; and 2) there was no clear error in the imposition of the enhancement in this case. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
Introduction The Imaginaries of Empire--Theory, Discourse, and Policy Within and Around China, its Heartland, Peripheries and Projections Abroad (Larry Catá Backer and Matthew MacQuilla) pp. 1-16 (Access Here) B. [read post]
