Search for: "B. J. K."
Results 61 - 80
of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2009, 5:09 pm
[… There is] no need to go beyond the principles considered in the well-established jurisprudence summarized in J 7/90 and also endorsed in J 6/02. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
(b) A 90(1) provides that the EPO shall examine, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations to the EPC, whether the application satisfies the requirements for the accordance of a date of filing. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:05 am
Steger & Erin K. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:43 pm
Gilson & Charles K. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:54 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
This generally means that (1) A would rest on some justification J and (2) justification J would also justify B. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:21 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am
G1/97, Nr. 3 b) der Entscheidungsgründe, ABl 2000, 322).2. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:42 am
G1/97, Nr. 3 b) der Entscheidungsgründe, ABl 2000, 322).2. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:16 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 12:22 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm
As regards the time limit for the payment of the renewal fees for a European patent application under A 86, the EPO is under no obligation to remind the applicant of its expiration and the applicant can derive no right from the absence of any such reminder (established jurisprudence following J 12/84; J 1/89). [7] The appellant also submitted that if a further prosecution of the application is refused based on non-payment of the renewal fee, it would defeat the purpose of R 108(3).… [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:00 am
Neumar Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Civic Duty - Torben K. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:50 pm
o) return b; var x = 0, y = 0, p = o; try{ do { y+=p.offsetTop || 0; x+=p.offsetLeft || 0; p = p.offsetParent||p.parentNode; }while(p); }catch(e){} b.l = x; b.t = y; return b; }function adjustLKMediaDiv(event){var divs = document.getElementsByName('lk_juiceapp_mediaPopup_div');for(i=0;i<divs.length;i++){var d = divs[i];var embs = document.getElementsByTagName('embed');var… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Nov. 5, 2018 Munley, J.), Judge Julia K. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:15 am
B & MP, LLC et al Court Case Number: 1:14-cv-00206-WTL-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2014Plaintiff: Noble Roman’s Inc.Plaintiff Counsel: Steven K. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
How times have changed. yīnwèi wǒde pǔ tōnɡ huà bù jíɡé, Wǒde fēn shù bú ɡòu shànɡ zhongxué，suǒ yǐ，chú le ɡōnɡ zuò hé zài yèxiào xuéxí wǒ miéyǒu biéde xuǎn zé。Na ge shi hou，pǔ tōnɡ huà… [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:32 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
