Search for: "B. Keller" Results 61 - 80 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
The safe harbor is not absolute: Section 2258B(b) disqualifies providers from protection under certain circumstances, such as if the provider engages in intentional misconduct. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:07 pm by Michael Fitch
Under B, the FCC states that for fixed RF sources that do not qualify for an exemption, a “determination of compliance” must be performed to ensure that RF exposure limits are not exceeded in places that are accessible to people. [read post]
Moreover, beginning in 1966 with a case known as Keller Plastics, 157 NLRB 583, the Board has held that an employer’s lawful voluntary recognition of a union immediately barred the employer and/or its affected employees from raising a question concerning the union’s representative status for “a reasonable period of time. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:21 am by Michael Fitch
For more information about any of these state laws, please contact Michael Fitch, Keller and Heckman Senior Counsel, (fitch@khlaw.com; 202-434-4264). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am by Eric Goldman
” With respect to Hickford and Words-N-Ideas, these defendants concede that one theory under which they could be held liable for Wilburn’s Allen B. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Defendant moved by notice of motion dated April 20, 2016, to dismiss the action based upon the plaintiffs failure to serve a complaint in accordance with CPLR 3012(b). [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 8:48 am by Eric Goldman
The History and Future of Content Moderation (panel featuring Nicole Wong, Charlotte Willner, and Dave Willner; moderated by Kate Klonick) Session A: Employee/Contractor Hiring, Training and Mental Well-being (panelists from Automattic, Medium, and Pinterest) Session B: Humans vs. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
Rangel, for Scripps NP Operating, LLC, a Wisconsin Limited Liability Company, Successor in Interest to Scripps Texas Newspapers, LP d/b/a Corpus Christi Caller-Times and the E.W. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND SOUTH TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS, Petitioners,v.YOLANDA LOPEZ, SHERYL HAMER, ELMER DEGUZMAN AND RICHARD WECKER, Respondents.No. 17-0733.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued March 12, 2019.Opinion delivered: May 17, 2019. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [I should note I think the Office is completely right in saying (1) §43(a)(1)(B) claims should survive Dastarwhere false attributions are material to consumers and (2) Dastar applies to in-copyright works as well. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
GIVING CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE Democrat Richard Hightower botches his first National Collegiate Student Loan Trust case after taking office as a member of Houston Court of Appeals Sheila Kirk v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The History and Future of Content Moderation (panel featuring Nicole Wong, Charlotte Willner, and Dave Willner; moderated by Kate Klonick) Session A: Employee/Contractor Hiring, Training and Mental Well-being (panelists from Automattic, Medium, and Pinterest) Session B: Humans vs. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:23 am by Stephen Sachs
As Scott Keller and Misha Tseytlin have discussed, the Court hasn't always been clear about when it will allow a facial challenge—or when it thinks an as-applied challenge is required, with other applications of the statute to be preserved. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
It is reported that Spice Girl Mel B has agreed to pay her former nanny Lorraine Giles nearly £2million in an out of court settlement of a defamation claim in Los Angeles. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Were a qualified privilege defense relied upon in this action, Defendant initially would have had to demonstrate that the County Executive made the  statements object to by Plaintiff  in her role as the Monroe County Executive in the course of discharging her duties and responsibility in order to keep the public informed regarding a sensitive issue that had obtained extensive media attention.Once this was done, the burden of going forward would have been shifted to Plaintiff, who… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Were a qualified privilege defense relied upon in this action, Defendant initially would have had to demonstrate that the County Executive made the  statements object to by Plaintiff  in her role as the Monroe County Executive in the course of discharging her duties and responsibility in order to keep the public informed regarding a sensitive issue that had obtained extensive media attention.Once this was done, the burden of going forward would have been shifted to Plaintiff, who… [read post]