Search for: "B. Potter" Results 1 - 20 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The Court of Appeal therefore disagreed with Mr Justice Jay’s finding that Mrs Potter could not rely on the LA 1980, s 32(1)(b). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Shortly after taking office, he had an opportunity to do that, with Justice Potter Stewart’s announcement in June 1981 that he would retire in early July. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:34 am by Neil H. Buchanan
This week saw some measure of justice for the mother and daughter in Georgia who were viciously targeted by Donald Trump, Rudolph Giuliani, and their vigilante enforcers. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by CMS
Mr Justice Jay found that Mrs Potter could not rely on s 32(1)(b) LA 1980 by itself because (a) the non-disclosure was not an active concealment but rather a case of omission to disclose; and (b) there was no legal duty to disclose the commissions. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Alan Neff
Gingles to review claims of effects-discrimination under §2(b), and reviews subsequent cases construing and applying amended §2(b) and the Gingles analysis. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am by Bernard Bell
  At least OSHA appears to have so concluded.[9] Thus, a general requirement of reasonableness, similar to that predominant in tort law with regard to accidental injuries, may be warranted.[10] B. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
In particular, should the court take account of either: (a) budgetary constraints imposed on the housing authority; or (b) the availability of housing under a non-secured tenancy under Part VII of the 1996 Act (as opposed to a secured tenancy under Part VI of the 1996 Act). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
The “Hairy Potter” case: In 2003, author J.K. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Matrix Law
And should the courts below have construed section 296(1)(b) of the 1992 Act so as to give effect to Article 11? [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
R.C.P. 2179 and 1006(b) and noted that a personal injury action against the corporation or a similar entity may be brought in a county where the corporation regularly conducts business. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
(b) Does the 1977 Act provide for the grant of a patent without a named human inventor? [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am by jonathanturley
It appears to follow Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s test for pornography in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
What have Samuel Beckett, James Joyce, George B Shaw, and William B Yeats in common? [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 2:00 am by David Pocklington
What have Samuel Beckett, James Joyce, George B Shaw, and William B Yeats in common? [read post]