Search for: "BAA v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am by NL
Hounslow owned the layby, which adjoined land owned by BAA. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am by NL
Hounslow owned the layby, which adjoined land owned by BAA. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:07 pm
" The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the breach of contract claim because the complaint failed to allege the defendant promised the plaintiff it would restrict competing gift stores to four stores.Analyzing the claim for breach of express and implied covenants, the Court of Appeals stated "an implied covenant to refrain from destructive competition may be inferred from a percentage lease, based on the duty of good faith and fair dealing, where the intentions of the… [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm by David Gallacher and Bryce Chadwick
The BAA establishes a preference for domestic end products – that is, products manufactured or produced in the United States – but (even though its name would seem to indicate to the contrary) the BAA does not impose an absolute requirement for the government to “Buy American. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:56 am by sally
Supreme Court Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shah v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2326 (13 October 2010) Dorset County Council v House (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Crim 2270 (13 October 2010) O & H, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2233 (13 October 2010) King v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Crim 2522 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v… [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
The law The issue of whether a claimant with an otherwise valid claim who substantially exaggerates that claim should lose their right to damages was considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Shah v Ul-Haq (2009) and Widlake v BAA Ltd (2009). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:58 am by Sarah Milsted, Olswang LLP
The trial judge held that he was bound by the Court of Appeal decisions in Ul-Haq v Shah (2009) and Widlake v BAA Limited (2009). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:00 am by Doug Leavitt
 Last week, a resolution agreement between the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) and North Memorial Healthcare proved that this issue is still extremely relevant and potentially costly. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by David Gallacher and Keeley A. McCarty
To qualify as a “domestic end product,” the BAA requires that: (a) the end product be manufactured in the U.S.; and (b) the “cost of its components … manufactured in the United States exceeds 50 percent of the cost of all its components. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
 The judge rejected in this regard the contrary conclusion that our Constitutional Court reached in S v Mamabolo. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm by Mark D. Rasch
Accordingly, because Plaintiff’s complaint does not plausibly allege duty, the claim for Negligence (Count IV) and Gross Negligence (Count V) must be dismissed. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
 Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]