Search for: "BAKER V. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO." Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
BP Products North America, Inc., 2009 WL 3169463, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
 Early developmentThe point of an evolving concept was illustrated further by reference to the leading case of Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  This is consistent with several court of appeals decisions issued shortly before Dukes, in particular the Seventh Circuit’s decision in American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute are unconstitutional even if considered civil or civil-criminal hybrid: Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Click Here BP in talks to settle Texas City fine -OSHA memo. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]