Search for: "BALL v. BALL"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
I grew up in this fast-paced city of skyscrapers, curry fish balls and impeccably efficient transport services, and spent formative years of my career practising law in Hong Kong. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
In rather typical fashion, Egilman wanted to create a faux issue about defense counsel’s hiding the ball. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
A Happy “Ed Balls Day” to our readers Whilst not featuring in the Church’s Liturgical Calendar, Ed Balls Day serves as a reminder to users of Twitter/X (by whatever name called) of the perils faced by internet users, for which the “Liking” of a Tweet may lead to a CDM Tribunal. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 10:25 am
“The Republican Justices Do Not Want to Talk About Donald Trump’s Coup Attempt; Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
The patent relates in particular to what happens when an object (such as a player or the ball) blocks the TV camera’s view of the display boards. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:23 am
Hostess Brands, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Employers should not take their eye off this ball. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
For example, in SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
Nearly a decade ago, in Yates v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm
Dennie has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:16 am
Dennie has this essay online at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
In light of the Defendant’s “hard ball” approach, the Judge refused to exercise her discretion under Rule 57.05(1). [read post]
