Search for: "BALLARD v. US "
Results 81 - 100
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 2:11 pm
In Ballard RN Center, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:29 pm
In FTC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
Hat tip to Dan Ballard for this!). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
No, says the Texas Supreme Court in Hyder v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:19 pm
Ballard v New York Safety Track, LLC, 2015 WL 919739 (NYAD 3 Dept. 3/5/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/decisions/2015/518627.pdfFiled under: Access to Government, Current Caselaw - New York Tagged: mootness [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
For more info about us, click here. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm
The facts, from Pacheco v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:49 am
See Ballard v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Ballard Spahr attorneys have written an amicus brief submitted by the Houston Housing Authority (HHA). [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:28 am
Ballard, 2012 WL 2342929, at *4 (D. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
CitiFinancial, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
” Ballard Med. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
Lastly, the Applicant uses her full name Michele Ballard Miller, in conjunction with her marketing efforts for the firm name Miller Law Group, drawing further attention to the term as a surname. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
Ballard). [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
” At New Civil Rights Movement, Jean Ann Esselink reports that a “New York based group known as The Satanic Temple has used” the Court’s June decision in Burwell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
Ballard, 2012 WL 2342929, *5 (D. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Only one of last week’s relists was denied, Ballard v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Though respondent began using “Hana Bank” well after petitioner first used “Hana Financial,” respondent argued that it actually had priority under the trademark “tacking” doctrine, under which a party may “tack” its earlier use of a trademark to a latter mark that has been slightly modified. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
*****************************************The last word from blog readers on the subject goes to Tony Ballard (partner, Harbottle & Lewis LLP), who does not so much rewrite the abstract as comment on it:"Surely all the abstract is saying, once you strip out the academic hocus-pocus, is that copyright should not restrict access to and use and reuse of protected works in the digital domain. [read post]
