Search for: "BARNES v. NORTH CAROLINA" Results 41 - 60 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday evening the Supreme Court, at the request of North Carolina Republicans, agreed to put a hold on a lower-court order to redraw the state’s congressional districts, which the lower court had invalidated as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Instead, the North Carolina Property Protection Act, passed over then-Gov. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Justice Stephen G. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, another First Amendment ruling, the court struck down a North Carolina law that barred sex offenders from accessing social-media sites that allowed minors to create accounts. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that yesterday the court without comment denied a motion to have the mandate issued immediately in North Carolina v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Sam Bray points out that the “Supreme Court said two interesting things about equity [last] week”; he notes that “the takeaway from the court’s opinion” in an election-law case, North Carolina v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At The American Prospect, Eliza Newlin Carney observes that the court’s recent decision striking down two North Carolina congressional districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymanders “has sparked speculation that the high court might be poised to look at partisan gerrymandering in a more critical light. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Ave podcast features a discussion of Supreme Court retirement rumors and an interview of Hans von Spakovsky about recent voting-related cases from North Carolina. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
Harris, in which the justices upheld a lower court’s ruling that North Carolina relied too heavily on race in drawing the boundaries of two congressional districts. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
Harris, the justices upheld a lower court decision finding that in drawing the boundaries of two congressional districts, North Carolina relied too heavily on race. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in a statement accompanying the order in the North Carolina voter ID case, “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:55 am by Alyson Grine
North Carolina’s No-Impeachment Rule: North Carolina’s no impeachment rule in Rule of Evidence 606(b) is similar to Colorado’s in all relevant respects. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:55 am by Alyson Grine
North Carolina’s No-Impeachment Rule: North Carolina’s no impeachment rule in Rule of Evidence 606(b) is similar to Colorado’s in all relevant respects. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment; McLane v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The justices issued an opinion yesterday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage of Sotomayor’s dissent comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]