Search for: "BARNES v. NORTH CAROLINA" Results 101 - 120 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 8:23 am by Susan Brenner
Hull also had online conversations with officers in Missouri and North Carolina who posed as mothers of young females. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
Barnes 14-395Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
North Carolina, where they extended the bounty of dishonest by adding in stupidity. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, who notes that “Democratic lawyers were not surprised by the court’s action Tuesday, since they had little expectation of blocking the Ohio cutbacks — especially compared with the far more draconian changes in other states such as Texas, North Carolina and Michigan,” Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, and Greg Stohr at Bloomberg. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Sam Bray points out that the “Supreme Court said two interesting things about equity [last] week”; he notes that “the takeaway from the court’s opinion” in an election-law case, North Carolina v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
The petition asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Barnes, 14-395, involving jurors receiving third-party religious advice on the death penalty, earned its fourth relist. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Barnes, 14-395, is close behind with five relists. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Barnes 14-395 Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Barnes 14-395Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
The five states are Illinois, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am by Marty Lederman
Evans (2002), North Carolina argued that Utah lacked standing to sue to challenge the denial of a House seat that the President had allocated to North Carolina. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm by Paralegal Mentor
See also, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 79; Florida Statutes Title VI, Civil Practice & Procedure, 57.104; North Carolina Guideline 8; Comment to NALA Guideline 5; Michigan Guideline 6. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Barnes, 14-395, a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors who received third-party religious advice on the death penalty, asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:50 pm by David
Bernie Hansen of North Carolina State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, who has devoted his life to studying postoperative pain in dogs and cats. [read post]