Search for: "BARNETT v. BRETT" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Barnett, “Why is Everyone Afraid of IP Licensing? [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
A Federal Judge has refused an application to dismiss a libel claim by producer Brett Ratner against a woman who used him of rape. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Randy Barnett  and Keith Whittington  have pla [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered how unjustified threats of legal action may amount to harassment illustrated by the recent case of Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1125. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Brett Wilson’s Media Blog has covered a Crown Court Judge’s appearance in Southwark Crown Court having been charged under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 for unauthorised access to the courts case management system. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  The Brett Wilson blog had a post as did 5RB. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
A recent Mother Jones headline aptly summarizes one potential line of attack: “How Brett Kavanaugh Could Cripple the Next Democratic President. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm by Ashby Jones
It’s [judges] Harry Edwards, Laurence Silberman, and Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh review federal agency statutory interpretations that come before him on the Court? [read post]