Search for: "BARRY et al v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2020, 7:55 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, et al., No. 19-337 (sovereign immunity) Garmin USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:40 pm by Andrews Thornton Higgins Razmara, LLP
For more information about the NECC case and exhibits from the Cadden trial, visit the United States Attorney’s Office District of Massachusetts website:  https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/usa-v-cadden-et-al. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:31 am by Docket Navigator
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al, 6-11-cv-00492 (TXED September 21, 2017, Order) (Mitchell, MJ) [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
IBG LLC, No. 19-353 (patentability of an improved user interface) Garmin USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al., the Court’s 2009 judicial recusal case. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc., 2017 BCCA 41 Argos Limited v Argos Systems Inc. [2017] EWHC 231 (ch) Technology Contracting Business Development Bank of Canada v Experian Canada Inc, 2017 ONSC 1851 SAP UK Ltd v Diageo Great Britain Ltd [2017] EWHC 189 (TCC) (16 February 2017) Barry Sookman SAP wins major lawsuit based on indirect use and named user license terms: SAP v Diageo Atos v Sapient, 2016 ONSC 6852 C&S Associates UK Ltd… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]