Search for: "BARTON v. DISTRICT COURT" Results 61 - 80 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2014, 4:40 am by Stephen Page
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARY BISHOP, ) SHARON BALDWIN, ) SUSAN BARTON, and ) GAY PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiffs, )) v. ) No. 04-CV-848-TCK-TLW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He ruled that the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 157692 (WD NC, Nov. 1, 2013), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed without prejudice a complaint by a Jewish prisoner that serving his kosher meals cold, or late, or delivering them along with non-kosher meals violates his free exercise rights.In Barton v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:13 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 120361 (CD CA, Aug 22, 2013), a California federal district court dismissed as frivolous an inmate's habeas corpus petition claiming that he had received a pardon from the Supreme pardoning authority of the Moorish Science Temple of America.In Barton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The government argued it didn't need a warrant based on cases from the 70s based on third party doctrine - US v Miller (bank records) and Smith v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
The complete list of new cases filed in the three United States District Courts filed in the last week and a half since Christmas Eve are below. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
* Use immunity   The question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:44 am
May 10, 2012).* Circuit courts have split on the issue whether Brady v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 12:47 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Posner who remarked that Illinois courts would not enforce Barton's non-compete. [read post]