Search for: "BARTON v. DISTRICT COURT" Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Breyer, writing for the court in this case, Rowe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Sarina v O’Shannassy (No.5) [2020] FCCA 2911, in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Paul Levy
by Paul Alan Levy This week the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an excellent decision rejecting a series of bogus trademark claims and hence a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by Ascentive, a software maker, against Opinion Corp., whose PissedConsumer web site provides a forum for consumers to post complaints (or praise). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Barton, 15-580, which involves a tricky issue of determining whether a state court ruled on a procedural or substantive basis and the types of review applicable to each. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:32 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees’ plea that the employer independently violated the state wage law’s “notice” provisions offered them no recourse (Barton v House of Raeford Farms, Inc dba Columbia Farms, Inc, March 11, 2014, Niemeyer, P). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(Patents4Life) Role of Washington DC District Court in patent cases (Patently-O) Did you know... the prevailing party in a section 337 investigation is not automatically a party on appeal at the Federal Circuit? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(Patents4Life) Role of Washington DC District Court in patent cases (Patently-O) Did you know... the prevailing party in a section 337 investigation is not automatically a party on appeal at the Federal Circuit? [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]