Search for: "BATES v. MAINE, STATE OF"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2013, 5:13 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
Dr Ed Bates, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Southampton. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
As stated by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire when interpreting a policy excluding water loss, "[t]o apply the ensuing loss provision to provide coverage for what is essentially a flood would subvert the intent of the parties" (Bates v Phenix Mut. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
(1) As in Bates v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:15 pm
John Bates, a George W. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
The post Homelessness & Allocations by Arden, Bates and Vanhegan appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:45 pm
” He asked O’Quinn: “What checks the action of the United States regarding these detainees? [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
There's also a long, rather technical footnote (br. at 46 n.12) about why Bates v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
The last time we covered the progress of the case that I’ll call Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Shortly after Riegel v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:45 am
Circuit Court, in Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:14 am
With commentary at the Lock Law Blog, Ryan Lockman argues that “there is a minimal chance that [the state] will convince Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy and the three remaining conservatives to encroach on state sovereignty in such a fashion, particularly when the main authority on which their argument is based is Bush v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:12 pm
Goliath v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am
All parties concerned will no doubt be awaiting the Supreme Court’s judgment with bated breath. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm
When we last looked in on Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
