Search for: "BB v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2024, 12:54 pm by Michael Oykhman
In R v Hault, the court examines directly what the necessary intent, or mens rea, is, under s. 101, stating that the court must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual accused was aware that they committed the act, whether intentionally, with knowledge, recklessly, or with wilful blindness. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:43 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Lawyers who engage in discriminatory conduct can also be sanctioned under the state analogs to Rule 8.4(g). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am by Kurt R. Karst
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
” by The Black Eyed Peas (F, C, Dm, Bb) “Stand By Me” by Ben E. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:32 am by Mack Sperling
The Business Court has given the same interpretation to Rule 30(e) at least three times, in BB&T Boli Plan Tr. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: Top Marginal State Income Tax Rates Table: 2023 State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets Notable 2023 State Individual Income Tax Changes Historical State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2015-2023 Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 40 percent of state tax collections. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:20 pm by Giles Peaker
I regret to state that I did not believe him. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:39 am by Peter D. Hardy and James Mangiaracina
  If ultimately enacted as law, even a scaled-back version of this amendment could significantly alter the Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”) regulatory framework in the United States. [read post]