Search for: "BB v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2018, 7:37 am
Zavras v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Atwood v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 2:53 pm
Comm. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
MD Haynes, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:12 am
This means that local governments are not allowed to enact laws concerning firearms and pneumatic guns (bb guns or pellet guns), unless they are specifically allowed to under federal and/or state Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
This post was authored by Paul Knothe and Kaylee Feick On May 30, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Mendez v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:52 am
As part of my extensive research for this blog post, I looked up the text of the AHCA, scrolled down to a random part of it, landing on this paragraph: (I) The ratio described in subclause (II) of clause (v) that would be determined for such State by substituting ‘2015’ for each reference in such subclause to ‘the third preceding year’ and by substituting ‘all such States’ for the reference in item (bb) of such subclause to… [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:13 pm
In Davenport v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am
It was a BB gun…. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
Baker, where a group of consumers in Washington State have sued Microsoft, complaining that its Xbox 360 device had a defect. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Aug. 9, 2016) In Vitale v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:51 am
In Crockett v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
The Court noted that under subsections (4)(A)(i)(II)(bb), when an allegedly defective product is sold in all fifty states, but a class action is only brought on behalf of an in-state class against an out-of-state manufacturer and a few in-state retailers, the Ninth Circuit recognized in Coleman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm
Water Splash, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm
BB&T Corp., et. al., No. 7:16-cv-00332 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
