Search for: "BEATTY v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
The defendants attempted two arguments to demonstrate that FBT was not in fact the copyright owner of the sound recordings. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Amici and attorney list at bottom of post.NB: Hotlinks are to documents behind PACER paywall and will incur charges if logged into account.Date Filed#Docket Text11/26/20171 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER SOUGHT) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5219866) filed by Leandra English. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
Yesterday, almost two years after hearing arguments, the Supreme Court of South Carolina finally issued its decision in the case of The Protestant Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
Witnesses for each day are listed in alphabetical order not in running order. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The judge gave judgment for the claimant on her misrepresentation claim of £13,100 and judgment of the defendant on its libel counterclaim of £5,000. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Under EPCRA, companies must also report both routine and accidental releases of toxic chemicals, as well as the maximum amount of any listed chemicals at the facility and the amount contained in wastes transferred off-site. [read post]