Search for: "BELL v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 21 - 40
of 197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2022, 9:14 pm
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The parties agree that United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Bell Atl. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:29 am
However, that class is only for Department of Defense procurements, so for now, we’ll focus on the others first. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
Defense judgment.(4) Mootness – On the way is not the same as being there Fernandez et al v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 8:10 am
However, the parties continue to negotiate over several key issues, including the banning of certain police practices and the ability to transfer surplus military equipment to police departments. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
Its final antitrust battle was a quagmire that spanned two political administrations, and despite this, its political power was so great that it was able to get the Department of Defense to claim its monopoly was vital to national security. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 9:06 pm
The trial date in the United States of America v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Kitchen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm
This list includes the Department of State; Department of Homeland Security; National Institutes of Health; the Pentagon; Department of the Treasury; the Department of Justice; the Federal court system; Department of Commerce; and the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
Bell, Rutgers Law School When can Congress protect agency heads from at-will removal by, or at the behest of, the President? [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Defense attorneys Chris Flood of Houston and John D. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Louis v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Appellate Division, First Department Former boyfriend who voluntarily provided Sperm without any restriction or agreement not permitted to raise defense to paternity of equitable estopped In Matter of Claudia B v Darrin M, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2020 WL 3848213, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
