Search for: "BELL v. MCDONALD"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm
Fast food and grocery store chains canceled orders for the BPI — with Burger King, Taco Bell and McDonald’s ending their use of LFTB well before the ABC reports. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:11 am
Algunos de los multados son Burger King, Church’s Chicken, McDonald’s, KFC, Popeye’s, Subway, Taco Bell y Wendy’s. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Stevens (2010), McDonald v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Stevens (2010), McDonald v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
McDonald’s, Burger King and Taco Bell had already stopped using LFTB in their hamburgers and tacos. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
Gerson and Rocco V. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
McDonald had seen enough. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Regarding Taco Bell’s ads featuring people named Ronald McDonald enjoying their food. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A, Merger, Private… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A, Merger, Private… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 10:28 pm
The court of appeals upheld that practice as applied to months of imprisonment in McDonald v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
That is worse than the infamous McDonald’s coffee case. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Bell Atlantic. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
Bell (9th Cir. 1981). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm
McDonald). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
For example, libertarians and conservatives worked together to expand judicial protection for Second Amendment rights in District of Columbia v> Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Adviser 1***Morrison Foerster LLP, BELL ATLANTIC CORP. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
