Search for: "BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD"
Results 41 - 60
of 11,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 9:17 am
The Massachusetts Reviewing Board vacated the award of section 34A benefits and awarded Ms. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
The Reviewing Board decision of O’Rourke v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
The Reviewing Board decision of O’Rourke v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:55 am
Recently, the Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents, Reviewing Board, affirmed a decision in favor of an injured employee’s temporary total incapacity benefits due to an industrial accident. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:53 am
The Reviewing Board stated that the arguments, on appeal, included the Workers’ Compensation Trust Fund contending that the re-insurer should pay the widow her benefits directly, at a rate of 100% of the benefits due. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:53 am
The Reviewing Board stated that the arguments, on appeal, included the Workers’ Compensation Trust Fund contending that the re-insurer should pay the widow her benefits directly, at a rate of 100% of the benefits due. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:08 am
More Blog Posts: Massachusetts Reviewing Board Holds that Judge’s Modification of Benefits Award was not Grounded in Medical Evidence, Boston Workers’ Compensation Attorney Blog, January 3, 2017 Massachusetts Reviewing Board Awards Total Incapacity Workers’ Compensation Benefits to Employee Based on Combination of Previous Work-Related Injuries and Industrial Incident, Boston Workers’ Compensation Attorney… [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:08 am
More Blog Posts: Massachusetts Reviewing Board Holds that Judge’s Modification of Benefits Award was not Grounded in Medical Evidence, Boston Workers’ Compensation Attorney Blog, January 3, 2017 Massachusetts Reviewing Board Awards Total Incapacity Workers’ Compensation Benefits to Employee Based on Combination of Previous Work-Related Injuries and Industrial Incident, Boston Workers’ Compensation Attorney… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:15 am
The Massachusetts Reviewing Board of of Industrial Accidents recently reviewed a decision involving a judge’s allegedly harmful reliance upon medical opinions to modify a workers’ compensation award. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 12:54 pm
The Benefits Review Board reversed this decision, holding that the ALJ failed to address whether Claimant had the presumption of compensability under Section 20(a). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:20 pm
More Blog Posts: Massachusetts Reviewing Board Holds Medical Opinion Necessary to Support Finding of Compensability and Evidence Supports First Insurer’s Liability for Injured Painter’s Incapacity Period, Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Lawyer Blog, January 26, 2017 Reviewing Board Holds Judge Made Findings Contrary to Medical Evidence and Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Rules of Law Concerning Modification of… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
The Board further struck down Claimant’s argument that Section 6(b)(1) did not apply to benefits awarded under Section 8(c )(21). [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:30 pm
Traveling employees are different, though, and this is illustrated in a recent Reviewing Board decision (Board No. 015466-13). [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:24 pm
A recent Reviewing Board Decision, Breire v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:50 am
The Reviewing Board agreed. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 1:22 pm
In making their determination, the Board reviewed the employee’s credibility as well as supportive medical evidence to reach these findings. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:01 pm
On appeal, the Reviewing Board decided two issues raised by the employer’s insurer. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
The Reviewing Board agreed, reversing the prior decision and directing the re-insurer to pay the benefits. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
In a case before the Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents, the Reviewing Board assessed an injured worker’s claim for § 34 or, alternatively, §34A benefits from March 30, 2012 forward. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:06 pm
The administrative law judge denied the motion and awarded benefits to Claimant; Employer appealed to the Benefits Review Board. [read post]
