Search for: "BEST v. EVANS" Results 1 - 20 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2018, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The parent v. clinician conflicts in the cases of Charlie Gard and Alfie Evans attracted worldwide attention. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:47 am by Rick Hasen
  Election Law Blog readers may remember Judge Evans best for his dissent in the Seventh Circuit opinion in the Crawford voter id case. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS - Parental Rights, Best Interests and Significant Harms: A Comparative Perspective on Medical Decision-Making on Behalf of Children This collection has been inspired by the decision of the Court of Appeal in Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates [2017] (the “Charlie Gard case”) and the case of Alfie Evans (Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust v Evans and James [2018] EWHC 308 (Fam)). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Stephen Hut (best known to the No Man and me for his win that derailed Maryland’s death penalty in Evans v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm by Evan Criddle and Evan Fox-Decent
A few months ago the PSC rendered its decision in Isabelita Vinuya et al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix Chambers.
Magistrates’ Court: the Legacy of Norris v USA (No 2) In reaching his decision, DJ Evans relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Norris v USA [2010] 2 AC 487, which concerned the extradition of a 66 year old man with poor health whose wife could not accompany him upon extradition due to her ill health. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:05 am by JB
Far from being inconsistent with original meaning, a guarantee of reproductive freedom is the best reading of the Fourteenth Amendment.To be sure, my view is that the result in Reynolds is best understood under the Guarantee Clause and not under the Equal Protection Clause (L.O. pp. 243-44). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]