Search for: "BLACK VS. DIST. CT."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 1:11 am
Dist. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am
Ct. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
Ct. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
New York City: Private Security Firm and City Are Joint Employers Under Title VII; noted here · [5-7] Jury gives $5M to fem ex-Baldwin SD middle school Student Dean on her sex harass claims; more here> FILED · [5-11] Class of Black firefighters certified in USDOJ suit claiming NYC Fire Dept discriminates against Black and Hispanic applicants through its written examinations · [5-11] Gender: Four fem Ulster Cnty… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:11 am
Ct. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Maricopa County Community College Dist. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:12 am
Regional Library Dist., 2012 WL 1200448 (E.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
M.H., 863 N.E.2d 236, 244-45 (Ill. 2007) Status Calls Vs. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
College Dist., 07-35299 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Dist., No. 07-4728 (2d Cir. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
Lynd, Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 2nd Div. 2022 Actual Notice of Lis Pendens vs. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 4:04 am
Ct. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
Dist. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Dist. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Activism is the new black! [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
However, even if the letter of intent is a contract, it may be subject to a panoply of classical contract defenses such as the statute of frauds[8] (discussed later) and the parol evidence rule.[9][10] If the letter of intent is not a contract but nonetheless induced action or forbearance of the other party, it may be subject to a claim of promissory estoppel,[11] except that letters of intent which contain language that is expressly nonbinding may prevent plaintiffs from establishing… [read post]
