Search for: "BLACK v. SUPERINTENDENT"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2022, 1:29 pm
The Superintendent stood up and screamed at Mr. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 1:01 am
The case was appealed to the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
See also Doe 1 v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
In Cajune v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:59 am
That evidence was not good enough in this case.The case is Burgis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
In Cajune v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm
An informal body known as the Sierra Interagency Black Bear Group (SIBBG) tested privately manufactured bear-resistant containers and made recommendations to the Park and Forest Services regarding which containers to approve. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:56 am
Sierra Interagency Black Bear Group (SIBBG), 09-17152). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
” Finally, plaintiff asserts that, in May 2006, Superintendent Greenhall recounted that he had been severely assaulted by “six black boys,” but had “showed them. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:50 am
Hoover v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 8:41 am
First we had Brown v. board of education being overruled and now we have this incident in the USA. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:16 pm
The Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Berrie v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
" More recently, in C1.G v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:57 pm
More than 50 years after the Supreme Court struck down "separate but equal" in Brown v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am
The superintendent summarized the reactions: the impact has been significant and ongoing. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:27 pm
Division 1 of this court reversed the conviction in People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]