Search for: "BLAKE v. YOUNG"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2007, 2:09 pm
In June 2004, about a week before the Supreme Court decided Blakely, District Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts issued this remarkable 174-page opinion in US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
According to Sam Young of Tax Analysts several tax professionals have expressed concern over the Tax Court’s recent decision in Canal Corporation v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:06 am
In its private conference Thursday, the Supreme Court will consider whether to hear a case -- Washington v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
She was sixteen when she started—young enough that Blake had to buy her cigarettes. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:51 pm
In Blakes v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:11 pm
As detailed in this post, last month I helped a team of sharp young lawyers develop and file this cert petition in US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion in Blake v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
They include Green v. [read post]
12 Aug 2004, 8:55 am
Also a good read is Blakely v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
For Kathy, who is 66 years young, this is her seventh term. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
Yelp Facebook Not Liable for Account Termination–Young v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:30 am
(See generally Rosenberger v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:03 pm
Ryder Gilliland is a partner and Thomas Lipton an Associate at Blakes, Toronto [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:19 pm
And I suspect some other sentencing fans might want and wish the Supreme Court to be willing to reconsider the much younger rulings like Blakely and Booker. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:14 am
Young v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 5:49 pm
Blake and J. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:09 pm
Young Again Products, Inc. v. [read post]
