Search for: "BLANC V. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2011, 5:57 pm
This decision A.Y v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM systemKatfriend Darren Meale reports on the CJEU decision Continental Reifen Deutschland v Compagnie generale des etablissements Michelinwhich upheld tyre giant Continental’s appeal against Michelin, concerning their stylised registered mark ‘X’.The challenge of protecting a database without a sui generis right, this time from SingaporeKat friends Lau Kok Keng, Nicholas Lauw and Jiamin Leow report on… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
., Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner's Ass'n v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:20 am
New York State law does not recognize actions based on alleged violations of personal privacy.In Bartnicki v Vopper, USSC, 532 U.S. 514, the U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
French Supreme Court : End of the trade mark dispute over 'Cheval Blanc'Guest Kat Mathilde Pavis discusses the decade-long trade mark dispute between two wine-making companies -- will the latest court decision be indeed the finale of the dispute? [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
With regard to option (d), revenge is best served cold at your publication party -- preferably with a Sauvignon Blanc, Riesling, or Gewurztraminer. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
With regard to option (d), revenge is best served cold at your publication party -- preferably with a Sauvignon Blanc, Riesling, or Gewurztraminer. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
With regard to option (d), revenge is best served cold at your publication party -- preferably with a Sauvignon Blanc, Riesling, or Gewurztraminer. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
With regard to option (d), revenge is best served cold at your publication party -- preferably with a Sauvignon Blanc, Riesling, or Gewurztraminer. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
” Rusk State Hosp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court case of Hansberry v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Supreme Court case of Hansberry v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
