Search for: "BLOCK v. PEARSON" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
District Judge Keith Starrett of the Southern District of Mississippi sentenced Theddis Marcel Pearson and Telandra Gail Jones to 10 years in prison and ordered them to pay $18 million in restitution. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ramcharan v Pariser, 20 AD3d 556, 557; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d 272). [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:08 pm
My coverage of the analogous Pearson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
The language of the Agreement indicated the blocks included both federal lands and private lands. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
    N E A R B Y  H O T E L  O P T I O N S   Hyatt Regency Hotel 151 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 312-565-1234 *3 blocks from Sheraton   Ritz Carlton Chicago 160 East Pearson Street Chicago, IL 312-266-1000 *12 blocks from Sheraton   Doubletree Hotel 300 East Ohio Street Chicago, IL 312-787-6100 *4 blocks from Sheraton   Embassy Suites 511 N Columbus Drive … [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
Under these circumstances, the defendant established that its actions did not proximately cause the plaintiffs' alleged damages, and that subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiffs' rights by pursuing any remedies it deemed appropriate on their behalf (see Ramcharan v Pariser, 20 AD3d 556; Perks v Lauto & Garabedian, 306 AD2d 261; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d 272; Kozmol v Law Firm of Allen L. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Jenner & Block partners Carla Rozycki and David Haase discuss the history of the case leading to the high court ruling as well as the aftermath. [read post]