Search for: "BM v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:26 am
If, in response, to BMS's request regarding its launch plans Teva disclosed its actual state of mind then the judge considered it would have said that "it had no plans to launch efavirnez before expiry but was actively considering the option of doing so". [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 3:07 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court established limitations on personal jurisdiction over non-resident corporate defendants in state court “mass” actions in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:07 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 226 (24 March 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) BM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWHC 571 (Admin) (23 March 2009) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for [...] [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
Dealers are allowed to sell their inventory out of state, alter LCMs in their inventory to hold less than 11 rounds and can fulfill contracts to sell LCMs entered before BM 114 went into effect. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:17 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Makisi v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 (31 March 2011) BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Le Breton v Petrpodel Resources Ltd [2011] EWHC 769 (QB) (01 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) JSC BTA Bank v Solodchenko & Ors [2011] EWHC 843 (Ch) (05 April 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Panesar… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:51 am
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) - Read judgment Another control order has been ruled unlawful and quashed by the court of appeal, on the basis that the evidence relied upon to impose it was “too vague and speculative”. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:00 pm
”SOURCESDon Lee v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 8:06 am
Schumann v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
The Court’s nearly unanimous decision in Bristol-Myers v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Under Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova condition ("the BMS conditions"), Condition 5 requires the importer to give notice to the trade mark owner before any repackaged product is put on sale, and, on demand, supplies him with a specimen. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm
After defendant’s plea and before imposition of his sentence, the court has reviewed documents from BM’s case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:01 pm
After defendant’s plea and before imposition of his sentence, the court has reviewed documents from BM’s case from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
Cokus v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:44 am
The BMS case highlights the need for clear and unambiguous drafting in licence agreements (and in any amendments to licence agreements). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Sanofi-Synthelabo et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
No, said a Texas court in Enerquest Oil & Gas, LLC v. [read post]
