Search for: "BNSF Railway Co." Results 101 - 120 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 9:51 am by Amy Howe
The first grant came in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The case involved two charges asserting Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA") claims by individuals in Colorado against Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Massachusetts, BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
Escobar, forum shopping after BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:43 am
  Click here to read the court's decision in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Last week, it granted review in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:32 am by Steven Cohen
BNSF Railway Company – United States District Court – District of Nebraska – March 29th, 2016 – In this case, filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act, the defendant has filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Alan Blackwell (railroad expert witness). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:42 am
While the widespread use of the internet has provided many benefits to the legal community, e.g. online case law, electronic court dockets, etc., it has also brought some challenges. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm by Michael Ellis
Former BNSF Railway Co. whistleblower, Mike Elliot, attended the meeting. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
However, their claims for benefits under ERISA were dismissed with prejudice because they involved a dispute over the interpretation and application of the terms of a collectively bargained health plan, which was subject to arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (Hall v BNSF Railway Co, September 22, 2014, Martinez, R). [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm by Barry Barnett
Railroads In BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
BNSF Railway Company[2] was the first fully litigated case against an employer for violating BIPA, in the wake of massive settlements involving tech companies including Facebook ($650 million)[3], Google ($100 million)[4], TikTok ($92 million)[5], and Snapchat ($35 million).[6]   Meanwhile, the Illinois Supreme Court in West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Joy Waltemath
” Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Thomas joined in dissent, argued that “When an employee suffers a physical injury due to his employer’s negligence and has to sue in court to recover damages, it seems more natural to me to describe the final judgment as compensation for his injury than for services (never) rendered” (BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]