Search for: "BNSF Railway Company"
Results 121 - 140
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
filed suit in state court against Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (“BNSF”). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
This ruling is hardly a surprise and is consistent with the Court’s recent decisions in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Ct. 746 (2014) and BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
BNSF Railway Co., the Eighth U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
BNSF Railway Company[2] was the first fully litigated case against an employer for violating BIPA, in the wake of massive settlements involving tech companies including Facebook ($650 million)[3], Google ($100 million)[4], TikTok ($92 million)[5], and Snapchat ($35 million).[6] Meanwhile, the Illinois Supreme Court in West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 1:39 pm
BNSF Railway Company (Indian Right-of-Way Act)Feller v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
., February 14, 2017) (affirming dismissal of complaint for lack of jurisdiction because Sanchez failed to exhaust his administrative remedies) Miscellaneous *BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:31 am
BNSF Railway Company (Motion to Compel Arbitation; Damages) Simms-Hiatt v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
BNSF Railway Company (Race Discrimination - Wrongful Employment Discharge)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html People ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
Superior Court of California could hardly surprise anybody who noticed the court’s near-unanimous ruling last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:27 am
One such example is the Cowboy Sub, a 22-mile rail line originally purchased from the BNSF Railway Company in 1998 to save the rail line from abandonment. [read post]
Fear obesity could lead to other conditions supports rejected applicant’s regarded-as disabled claim
8 Mar 2018, 6:59 am
Employed by a company that was responsible for intermodal operations at a BNSF railyard, the applicant applied to the railway company for a safety sensitive job when it took over operations of the yard. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:47 pm
, decided on December 28, 2015, the Court of Appeals denied a petition to review an administrative decision of the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in which the STB held that the ICCTA, preempts the plaintiffs’ state-tort law claims against the BNSF Railway Company for damage caused by the flooding resulting from the railroad’s maintenance of an earthen embankment that bisects the Tubbses’ their property on which BNSF… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
The Montana courts had jurisdiction over BNSF, they argued, because of the company’s extensive operations in the state: BNSF operates nearly 3,000 miles of railroad tracks and employs over 2,000 people there. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:14 am
Today the court, in an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, made clear that its 2014 ruling applies fully to bar two lawsuits that were brought in Montana against BNSF Railway by former employees who did not live there and were not injured there. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:53 pm
Fortunately, no one was injured when a BNSF Railway train left the tracks near Casselton, but out of an abundance of caution the town’s 2,400 residents temporarily evacuated in the wake of the derailment of the mile-long train, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
BNSF Railway Co. offered the plaintiff a job as an electronic technician, conditioned on his completing a medical history questionnaire and physical. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
Plaintiffs were a class of local property owners who filed a complaint in Wisconsin state court against Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:09 pm
Co-moderators for the conversation are Paul Balanon, senior general attorney at BNSF Railway Company, and Spencer Mainka, an associate attorney at Pham Harrison. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:56 am
Oral argument argued before the Eighth Circuit U.S. [read post]
