Search for: "BONE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 281 - 300
of 581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 9:11 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:18 am
In addition, in the little window of time between the first holiday weekend of Christmas and the second holiday weekend of the New Year, Judge Woodlock of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a very comprehensive and detailed opinion in the case of Island View Residential Treatment Center, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Jan. 21, 2011); LeFaivre v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
If the state can limit taxes in the name of private freedom, then why can the state not also limit zoning as well? [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:51 am
Leavitt, the first ISDEAA contract support costs case, and United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:22 pm
In the instant case, it would seem that reasonably prudent persons in the position of the defendants would see that their actions setting prices in the United States would negatively affect customers in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
United States, No. 2:15-cv-00378 (M.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
(Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bone Care – Court exercises discretion to avoid ‘sandbagging’ rebuttal cases: Bone Care Int’l, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 1:30 am
In the first trial, on December 10, 2010, in Tookes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
This competitor has outpaced Delaware’s legislative progress, is purported by Forbes to be the “Delaware of digital asset law,” and has sparked rumors that it could chip away at Delaware’s dominance as the corporate capital of the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
FDA, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, June 22, 2010 (“Complaint”). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
The Court accepted that, in any kind of suit, §337(a) restricts the ability of a plaintiff to pursue a theory that turns on claimed FDCA violations:Section 337(a) of the FDCA bars private enforcement of the statute, stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Rather than discussing how life will change for various groups of people in America, I want to engage in informed speculation about how the legal system in the United States will look in a few years. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982) which held the 29 USC 216 controls settlements on this type of case, and allows only Court approved or Department of Labor approved cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
See, Biomedino, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Medtronic and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
