Search for: "BORDEN v. DAY" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Some exhibits (e.g. the original fabric from the leading non-identical artistic work infringement decision in Designers Guild v Russell Williams, which this Kat has still never seen) are going to be kept but others -- including the photos of the jif lemon and Borden ReaLemon in Reckitt & Colman v Borden) are going to be ditched, if they haven't already. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Three lemons: bad newsfor passing-off plaintiffsThe question to be decided at appeal was whether this reputation among a significant section of the public in the UK, in the absence of goodwill, was enough to form the basis of a successful passing off action where the remaining requirements of misrepresentation and damage in the classic Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 ‘Jif Lemon’ trinity of criteria were satisfied. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives UAS: UAS Operators v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
What you may not know is that Lizzie Borden’s lead attorney’s law firm continues to this day to maintain her client files in a confidential manner. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
This article provides more details on the following comment that I posted (April 10th) to Dan Pinnington’s article of April 8th, “Ontario Judge Strongly Pushes for Greater Use of Technology in Courts and Orders E-Trial”: My Comment, excerpted: Make the preparation work of a lawyer making production comparable to that of an accountant. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
’  The classic action of passing off is based on the trinity of (i) goodwill, (ii) misrepresentation to the public, and (iii) damage to the claimant, as was reaffirmed in the 'Jif Lemon' case (Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] UKHL 12). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
“It is about promises that Borden made, mostly to men in those days and prior to Vimy Ridge, that if you fight for your country and you are injured, we will care for you and for your family if you fell,” said Sorochan. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:24 am by Mitch Kowalski
He did so because of a perceived conflict of interest over his role at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP; BLG represents the Toronto Police when they are sued. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
Another day, another fascinating BBC snippet with which to enrich our understanding of contemporary IP law. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
| Canadian Lawyer Magazine – http://bit.ly/KWtyZT (Dara Nevin) When Litigation Hits, The First 7 to 10 Days is Critical – http://bit.ly/LigIC2 (Doug Austin) Who Can Get Your Tweets, and Can You Object? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm by Shelley Brown
Black/White & Brown: Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka KF 228 B76 B53 2009 Brown v. [read post]