Search for: "BOYES' ESTATE v. BOYES"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
” “Even were it not untimely, the malpractice claim should also be dismissed because “the proximate cause of any damages sustained by plaintiff was not the alleged malpractice of defendant[], but rather the intervening and superseding failure of plaintiff’s successor attorney” (Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
