Search for: "BP Lubricants USA Inc"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 3:49 pm
In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., Misc. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:13 pm
Although the Gray On Claims Blog recently reported that the number of false marking qui tam lawsuits appears to have slowed since the Federal Circuit’s March 15, 2011 decision in In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., in which the Court held that the particularity requirement of Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Highlights this week included: CAFC: False marking must be pled with particularity: In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Inventive Step) (IPBiz) (271 Patent Blog) (Gray on Claims) (Patent Law Practice Center) (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
Earlier this week, in In re BP Lubricants USA, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (Fed. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Heightened Pleading Standards in False Marking Cases On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit granted in part a petition for writ of mandamus in In Re BP Lubricants USA Inc., Misc. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
In the first real set back to plaintiffs, the Federal Circuit in In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., 637 F.3d 1307 (Fed. [read post]
