Search for: "BRITTON v. MORRIS"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 am
Defendant's contention that plaintiff's motion is premature because more discovery is required is unsupported by any evidence suggesting that additional discovery will lead to further relevant evidence (see CPLR 3212[f]; Zinter Handling, Inc. v Britton, 46 AD3d 998, 1001 [2007]; Duane Morris LLP v Astor Holdings Inc., 61 AD3d 418 [2009]). [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:15 am
Britton KINGS COUNTY Land Use and Planning Reversal, Annulment of Rezoning Amendment Denied; Rezoning Rational, Not Illegal Spot Zoning Fetman v. [read post]
