Search for: "BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 5:33 am
Attorney’s letter to Judge Caproni, Johnson’s testimony in another criminal case suggested that he chose not to find out key details about a tipper’s source of information concerning the expected acquisition of Foundry Networks, Inc. by Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:35 pm
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., C.A. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
., was tipped in advance of a July 2008 announcement that Foundry Networks Inc. had agreed to be acquired by Brocade Communication Systems Inc. for approximately $3 billion. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:16 pm
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., the court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, holding that plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the claim that the defendant’s proxy statement amounted to a breach of fiduciary duty because of deficient disclosures. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:17 am
After the jury found defendant A10 Networks ("A10") liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and infringement of patents owned by Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al ("Brocade"), the court entered two permanent injunctions against A10, one that prohibited additional patent infringement and another that applied to the misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., many cases in which preliminary injunctions were denied are still pending resolution regarding other relief requested by the plaintiffs, such as damages. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:13 am
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:03 am
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
Specifically, in a case concerning Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., a plaintiff sought injunctive relief based on alleged omissions regarding a proposal to increase the number of shares in an equity options plan. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
Specifically, in a case concerning Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., a plaintiff sought injunctive relief based on alleged omissions regarding a proposal to increase the number of shares in an equity options plan. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
Specifically, in a case concerning Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., a plaintiff sought injunctive relief based on alleged omissions regarding a proposal to increase the number of shares in an equity options plan. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
Specifically, in a case concerning Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., a plaintiff sought injunctive relief based on alleged omissions regarding a proposal to increase the number of shares in an equity options plan. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Yesterday’s announcement that the chief executive of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Here are the noteworthy trade secret, non-compete and cybersecurity stories from the past week, as well one or two that I missed from the previous week: Noteworthy Trade Secret and Non-Compete Articles, Cases and Posts: A San Jose jury has awarded $112 million to networking equipment supplier Brocade Communications Systems Inc., finding that A10 Networks Inc. stole its trade secrets and infringed its intellectual property to start a competing business… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
The '404 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Nuance Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
The '404 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Nuance Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps A10 Networks – Failure to timely produce source code and violation of protective order warrant attorneys’ fee sanction at $630 blended rate: Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:11 am
Twitter, Inc. [read post]
