Search for: "BROOKS v. A. A. DAVIS & CO"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Davis). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Davis). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Mass. 1993), aff'd, 39 F.3d 384 (1st Cir. 1994).Montana: Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM) United States US General Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Brooks, 12 S.W. 975 (1889), overruled on other grounds by Dixie Glass Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
Davis & Hunter R. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:21 pm
Dan Brooks is another great thinker and practitioner. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
L. 1221-1253 (2011).Rice, Brooks V. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Honda Motor Co., Inc., No. 06-CV-02433, Dkt. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 Nicola Davies J will hear the privacy trial of AAA v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
” In holding that Domestic Relations Law § 70 “permits a non-biological, non-adoptive parent to achieve standing to petition for custody and visitation” (Brooke S.B., 28 NY3d at 27), the Court of Appeals stressed that it “has gone to great lengths to escape the inequitable results dictated by a needlessly narrow interpretation of the term ‘parent’ ” (Brooke S.B. at 24). [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
Before the statement was read the judge considered objections by the BBC to the statement and gave an ex tempore on the correct approach to be taken towards a non-settling co-defendant’s objections to the reading [Updated]. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
China ought to have known were pirated: (IAM),IFPI v Yahoo judgment - Uncertainty is bad for business: (Experience Not Logic),Court grants ‘well-known' status to B&Q's Chinese trade mark: (Rouse & Co. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The trial testimony established that the mother and Trini G., the mother’s boyfriend with whom she and her children lived for nine years (from the time the child was two to three months old), “co-parented” all of the children by contributing financially to their care and feeding, bathing and playing with them. [read post]
