Search for: "BROWN v. CLARK" Results 121 - 140 of 484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 2:00 am
STUDENTS WERE NEEDLESSLY ARRESTED OR SENT TO MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIESIn early March, the United States Department of Justice announced that it had reached a settlement with Florida’s Pasco County School District resolving an investigation into alleged discrimination of students with disabilities.When it came to school discipline, the school district would “routinely” suspend mentally ill students or have them arrested rather than attempt to secure “proper support” or to… [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Dara Brown and Jaeeun Shin at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute also provide a preview. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:52 am by Kiran Bhat
At the National Law Journal (via Law.com), Clark Neily and Paul Sherman urge the Court to grant cert. in Locke v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am by Laura Sandwell
Hilary Term begins in the Privy Council on Thursday 12 January 2012 with the one day hearing in front of Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr and Wilson of Rukhmin Balgobin v South West Regional Health Authority, which is on appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
  The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:21 am
With the continuing drama of the Scruggs scandal unfolding daily, sometimes hourly, I almost forgot to blog about the Katrina case that I have written about perhaps more than any other -- Broussard v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:21 pm by Hull and Hull LLP
This very question is the subject of the recent, instructive ruling of Justice Brown in Colangelo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am by Blog Editorial
Following the High Court decision that the maximum time that a person can be held in police detention is 96 hours, including time spent on police bail (unless there is new evidence justifying further arrest), and the Government plan to introduce emergency legislation to reverse the decision, the Supreme Court has issued the following ruling: “On 30 June 2011 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted permission to appeal in this case and the appeal will be heard on 25 July by Lords… [read post]