Search for: "BUCK v. COLE" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
This owes, in large part, to the High Court of Australia’s unanimous decision[1]in Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
” In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh discusses Buck v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
 It was expressed most forcefully by two of the great common law judges then on the bench, Learned Hand and Jerome Frank; in a case involving a musical composition infringement claim (Arnstein v [Cole] Porter], Judge Frank (joined by Hand) wrote: The proper criterion on [the infringement] issue is not an analytic or other comparison of the respective musical compositions as they appear on paper or in the judgment of trained musicians. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm by HumaRashid
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
Higginsville MO-Missouri  112 Buck's Country Mart 1601-09 Main Higginsville MO-Missouri  113 QUEEN'S MARKET 10724 HIGHWAY 21 HILLSBORO MO-Missouri  114 Lloyd's Thriftway 1200 East 10th Street Holden MO-Missouri  115 COUNTRY MART 200 SOUTH TOWNE BLVD. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]