Search for: "BUILDERS FINANCE COMPANY, INC. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:55 am
Beazer Homes USA, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is one of the ten largest single-family homebuilders in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
United States Download Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
See Tuscan Builders, LP v. 1437 SH6 L.L.C., 438 S.W.3d 717, 721 (Tex. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
"waters of the United States. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:11 am
"49 This statute was made use of in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
The Borrowers asserted causes of action for malicious prosecution, fraud, and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Consumer Protection Act, and the Finance Code. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Worcester, MA; Jose Silva, President) American Projects Funding And Private Financing Arrangments, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Gonzales, United States Attorney General, and Michael E. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Worcester, MA; Howard Gordon, President) Aquamarine Builders, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
The Borrowers asserted causes of action for malicious prosecution, fraud, and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Consumer Protection Act, and the Finance Code. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG) Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local distinctiveness in trademark… [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am
(Boston, MA) Affordable Home Builders, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
